Class Action Lawsuit Against Microsoft
- by Ayden
There’s a class-action lawsuit against Microsoft, and you can be part of it. It’s been going on for years, and it’s a good example of how anti-competitive behavior can affect consumers. In the 1990s, Microsoft was so dominant that it got into trouble with the Department of Justice for anti-competitive behavior. You could receive as much as $13 in damages if you bought the MS-DOS operating system or if you used the Office productivity suite. Other applications could also be worth up to $6.50 if you used the software, and so on.
In recent years, Microsoft has faced a growing number of class-action lawsuits over its antitrust practices.
In a Canadian antitrust suit, the company agreed to pay $417 million. About $400 million of that was earmarked for consumers in the state. This settlement is good news for consumers in Canada, but there are still many cases against Microsoft involving indirect purchasers. These include the California case, the Illinois suit, the Montana lawsuit, and the Massachusetts case.
The class-action lawsuit against Microsoft commenced in Canada 15 years ago. The company agreed to pay $517 million to the plaintiffs, with $400 million allocated for Canadians. Although Microsoft has denied wrongdoing, it does not want to be involved in long-term litigation over these claims. The eligible software includes Windows, Office, Word, Excel, Works Suite, Home Essentials, MS-DOS, and more. The settlement funds will be disbursed by a claims administrator to the Class Members who are eligible.
The class-action lawsuit against Microsoft alleges that the company used its consumer data for marketing purposes.
By using this data, the company allegedly obtained an unfair advantage over its competitors. As a result, the plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief, declaratory relief, restitution of profits, recovery of payments for Microsoft services, and an award of damages and interest. The case was settled in May 2014 and the plaintiffs’ attorneys are Bailey & Glasser, LLP and The Golan Firm PLLC.
Another class-action lawsuit against Microsoft claims that the company shared consumer information without consent. The company passed this information to Facebook and other third-party companies. Although the lawsuit was filed years ago, the lawsuit continues to drag on. The California court ordered Microsoft to pay $258 million in legal fees but ultimately reduced the total to $112 million. Regardless of the size of the award, the settlement reveals the company’s commitment to paying its employees fairly.
In the case against Microsoft, the company is accused of violating privacy and consumer protection laws.
In this case, the company was found to have used anticompetitive means to maintain its monopoly, while the plaintiffs were overcharged for their software. In the end, the settlement was a good deal for the companies. It was a win for the consumers. This lawsuit is an example of Microsoft’s anti-competitive behavior.
The California plaintiffs filed a class-action lawsuit against Microsoft in 2015. She claimed that a male director had harassed female employees. She was fired and later promoted. However, the company denied her complaints and moved the director to another part of the company. In this case, the woman had to file another lawsuit against Microsoft after complaining about the low salary. She was subsequently ignored by the boss. This settlement was eventually settled, but the lawsuit remains ongoing.
In the case of California consumers, a class-action lawsuit against Microsoft was filed in the Northern District of California.
It claims that Microsoft shared consumer information without the consent of the consumers. The plaintiffs also allege that the company improperly used the information to sell products. This lawsuit against Microsoft has been settled for more than $1 billion. It is also the third-largest class action against any company. If you use the Internet, there’s a chance you’ve experienced a Windows 10 upgrade.
The class-action lawsuit against Microsoft was filed in the Northern District of California, where the company admitted to mishandling consumer data. The company had shared the information with other companies, including Facebook. The plaintiffs’ lawyer sought to prevent the company from further harming its clients. They alleged that the information was used without consent by Microsoft and others. They have not received the requested compensation from Microsoft, so the case remains open. This is a great example of how a class-action lawsuit against Microsoft is important.
There’s a class-action lawsuit against Microsoft, and you can be part of it. It’s been going on for years, and it’s a good example of how anti-competitive behavior can affect consumers. In the 1990s, Microsoft was so dominant that it got into trouble with the Department of Justice for anti-competitive behavior. You could receive as…
- Force Placed Hazard Insurance Lawsuit
- Ford EcoBoost Engine Lawsuits
- Ford F150 Brake Failure Lawsuits
- Ford F-150 Transmission Problems Lawsuit
- Ford F150 Water Leaks Lawsuit
- Ford False Fuel Economy, Payload, and Road Load Claims
- Are You Eligible to File a Foreign Car Class Action Lawsuit?
- Forex Manipulation Lawsuits
- Dismissals in the GE Washing Machines Lawsuit
- The Settlement of a Forward Air Truck Driver Lawsuit
What about Microsoft charging a debit card that was never given to them for Microsoft 365. I used a NetSpend Master Card to pay the initial monthly $6.99 in March 2022. I cancelled the subscription because my son had bought one for his business and had 4 more devices 365 could be installed on. I did not put funds on my NetSpend card to cover any further payments and thought I cancelled the subscription I had purchased. Evidently they didn’t process the cancellation. Microsoft decided to fraudulently swipe information from my City National Bank card and charged 3 more monthly fees to that card. I had to cancel my CNB card to protect myself from my account being compromised. Microsoft reimbursed me for ONE of the $6.99 charges.
I wonder how many times they have done this to others. This is flat out scary that they have that much access to a card I had just had a couple of months and never purchased anything from them.